Rule of Law
Topic
Rule of LawBig Idea
Essential Question
How does the rule of law contribute to a free society and how would its absence affect society?Learning Standards Content
Students are expected to know the following:
- Government
- Branches of government - judicial
Curricular Competencies
Students are expected to be able to do the following:
- Make reasoned ethical judgments about actions in the past and present, and assess appropriate ways to remember and respond
- Assess the significance of people, places, events, or developments, and compare varying perspectives on their significance at particular times and places, and from group to group
Core Competencies
I can explain the concept of “rule of law” coherently.
I can analyze situations and identify consequences when the rule of law has not been applied in Canada or elsewhere.
I can consider why the rule of law is essential to free society
First People's Principles of Learning
Learning involves recognizing the consequences of one’s actions.-
- Go through the following scenarios adapted from “The Rule of Law: What is it? Why should we care?” By Barbara Billingsley
- Imagine … Living in a society where one day, while you are safely and reasonably driving your new car down the street, you are pulled over and arrested solely because the arresting police officer doesn’t like the colour of your car. After being released from jail, you paint your car another colour and then are pulled over and arrested again because a different police officer doesn’t like the new colour of your car.
- Imagine …Living in a society where the government prohibits murder but refuses to arrest or prosecute a high-ranking government official who intentionally shoots and kills an innocent person for no discernible reason in front of several eye-witnesses.
- Imagine …Living in a society where, at any moment, without any warning and without following any particular procedure, the government could seize your phone or your bank account.
- Ask students what it would be like living in a world like that.
- What is wrong with the above scenarios?
- What is the common feature that is missing?
- It’s the Rule of Law. Discuss how when laws are arbitrary, when certain people can act with impunity, and there is no due process society would be in chaos.
- Describe the recent situation in Haiti and how the rule of law is breaking down: how gangs launched co-ordinated attacks on key facilities, forcing the resignation of the country’s prime minister (aka no government). It has resulted in mass chaos, where looting of aid has happened and communities are on the brink of famine.
- Write preamble to Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms on the board: Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.
- Have students share with someone close what they first think of when seeing these words, particularly “rule of law.”
- After a few minutes, ask students what they discussed. Then, share that the rule of law is the idea that in order to function smoothly and fairly, all members of a society agree to abide by a common set of rules, called ‘the law’.
- Show Rule of Law: Civics Basics video until at least 4:03 (7:27), it is important to point out that this is an American video but concept is the same. Share that while it is perhaps imperfect, other countries believe in it too.
- Have students generate 1-2 questions each on little slips of paper or sticky notes after learning some topic throughout this lesson. Then have students bring them to you and have an assistant write those questions on a whiteboard somewhere in the room and monitor them when they are answered.
Part 1: World Justice Index Activity
- Send students to the www.WorldJusticeProject.org and specifically to the Rule of Law Index
- Break students into 8 groups and assign each one a rule of law “factor” (constraints on government power; absence of corruption; open government; fundamental rights; order and security; regulatory enforcement; civil justice; and criminal justice)
- Note that the index is a 0.0-1.0 scale where 1.0 is full adherence to the rule of law. The higher the number (greener), the stronger the country is in the rule of law. The lower the number (redder), the further away the country is from the rule of law.
- Ask students to:
- First find their factor to better understand its definition, as well as what sub-factors fall under it and their definitions. Keep the “Factors” tab open to refer back. Examples below if students are struggling with the sub-factor concepts:
- 4.1 Equal Treatment and Absence of Discrimination: identity results in being treated differently/worse. Examples: racial/gender discrimination, more people of colour in prison or not chosen for well-paying jobs
- 2 Absence of Corruption (all sub-factors): public officials use their position for gains, whether personal, financial or connections. Examples: Legislator takes money from a lobbyist and then votes in favor of the bill the lobbyist is pushing; Supreme Court Justice receives lavish gifts and trips from “friends” who then have cases in front of the Court where the Justice decides in their favor.
- Then, in another tab, find Canada and go into the specific factor they have been assigned (left column)
- Summarize and give key takeaways about what they read.
- First find their factor to better understand its definition, as well as what sub-factors fall under it and their definitions. Keep the “Factors” tab open to refer back. Examples below if students are struggling with the sub-factor concepts:
- If students finish early, have them look at the scores of lower indexes of the rule of law and ask themselves why they don’t rank higher.
- After that, provide some examples (below) of which sub-factors where Canada does well and does not do well.
- Canada does well:
- Constraints on Government Power – Transition of Power is Subject to the Law (0.95)
- Absence of Corruption – Government Officials in the Judicial Branch do not Use Public Office for Private Gain (0.95)
- Fundamental Rights – The Right to Life and Security of the Person is Effectively Guaranteed (0.95)
- Fundamental Rights – Freedom from Arbitrary Interference of Privacy is Effectively Guaranteed (0.91)
- Order and Security – Civil Conflict is Effectively Limited (1.0)
- Regulatory Enforcement – Government Regulations are Applied and Enforced Without Improper Influence (0.95)
- Regulatory Enforcement – Due Process is Respected in Administrative Proceedings (0.91)
- Civil Justice – Civil Justice is Free of Corruption (0.90)
- Criminal Justice – Criminal System is Free of Improper Government Influence (0.94)
- Canada does not do well:
- Open Government – Right to Information (0.65)
- Fundamental Rights – Equal Treatment and Absence of Discrimination (0.62)
- Regulatory Enforcement – Administrative Proceedings are Conducted without Unreasonable Delay (0.66)
- Civil Justice – People can Access and Afford Civil Justice (0.57)
- Civil Justice – Civil Justice is Free of Discrimination (0.53)
- Civil Justice – Civil Justice is not Subject to Unreasonable Delay (0.46)
- Criminal Justice – Criminal System is Impartial (0.54)
- Canada does well:
- Ask students to discuss
- why it has/has not gone well in that sub-factor (aka think about history)
- how the sub-factor may have an impact on the rule of law in Canada
- Additional discussion questions:
- Do we either have the rule of law or not?
- What risks are there of Canada slipping in the rankings?
Part 2: Case Study - Roncarelli v Duplessis
- Split the class into six groups and have students read the case study of Supreme Court of Canada case “Roncarelli v Duplessis”.
- Have students discuss the case and answer the accompanying questions.
- Have each group present their answers to one of the case study questions to the rest of the class, and invite other groups to add on if they would like.
- Reflection: How does the rule of law contribute to a free society and would you live in a society without the rule of law?
- Check the question monitoring to determine if all have been answered, and answer the remaining or commit to finding the answer for next time.
- Have a quick debrief about the case study, and introduce the concept of lawyer independence (see Lawyer Independence lesson plan) to help prep for that lesson.
- Have students listen to an episode of the Rule of Law Matters Podcast. (suggested: Season 1, Episodes 4 and 5 in particular).
- If there is time, listen to Episode 4 in class and have students follow up with Episode 5 for additional information.
- Have students summarize the episode by using the 5Ws + H questions.
- Have students read other cases: Edwards v. Canada and United States v. Nixon, and the Torture Memos from the Iraq War
- Give each group their own case and have them either jigsaw or share-out in the original major activity.
- Or, have students summarize the cases by using the 5Ws + H questions.
“What is the Rule of Law - and why does it matter?” 2020. Provincial Court of British Columbia. https://www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/enews/enews-04-11-2020
Rule of Law Matters Podcast. 2022. Law Society of British Columbia. https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/our-initiatives/rule-of-law-and-lawyer-independence/rule-of-law-matters-podcast/
“The Rule of Law.” 2023. Lexis Nexis Canada. https://www.lexisnexis.ca/en-ca/about-us/rule-of-law.page
“How The Rule of Law Promotes Prosperity.” 2019. PolicyEd on YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z_dswLk-58
“What does the rule of law have to do with me?” 2020. UNESCO on YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVhb5ltMHC4
“In Brief: Rule of Law.” 2012. Ontario Justice Education Network. https://ojen.ca/wp-content/uploads/In-Brief_Rule-of-Law.pdf
“What is Magna Carta?” 2015. British Library on YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xo4tUMdAMw